Head-to-head · bench tested
Fressko vs Frank Green vs Huskee：随行杯实测对比
这三款杯子才是你在澳大利亚咖啡馆柜台上真正经常看到的。Fressko's Camino、Frank Green's 陶瓷内胆杯和 HuskeeCup 采用了三种截然不同的路线：双层不锈钢、带按键盖的陶瓷内胆不锈钢，以及由回收咖啡外皮制成的复合材料。 我们对这三款杯子进行了相同的标准测试流程，并将每一款作为日常用杯使用了六周。它们之间的差距是真实存在的，但并不体现在价格标签所暗示的地方。
Our scores
Fressko Camino 340ml89/100
Frank Green Ceramic Reusable Cup 295ml84/100
HuskeeCup 8oz79/100
Spec chart
The numbers and features that actually change the buying decision.
| FresskoFressko Camino 340ml Our pick | Frank GreenFrank Green Ceramic Reusable Cup 295ml | HuskeeHuskeeCup 8oz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 价格 | AU$44.95 | AU$54.95 | AU$16.00 |
| 容量 | 340ml | 295ml | 237ml |
| Body material | Double-wall 18/8 stainless | Stainless with ceramic inner | Reclaimed coffee husk composite |
| Insulated | Yes | Yes | No |
| Lid type | Screw lid, single gasket | Push-button, multi-part | Press-on splash lid |
| Leakproof in a bag | Yes | Yes | No |
| Warranty | Lifetime on the vessel | Lifetime on the vessel | 12 months |
| End of life | Stainless is widely recycled | Mixed materials, harder to separate | Brand take-back and reprocessing |
Bench results
Same protocol, same day, same room. Method is listed under each test.
| FresskoFressko Camino 340ml Our pick | Frank GreenFrank Green Ceramic Reusable Cup 295ml | HuskeeHuskeeCup 8oz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build qualityWall flex under hand pressure, rim and thread inspection, weld and finish check, part count on the lid assembly. | No flex, single-piece body, one-gasket lid — highest score, 94/100 | Solid body, but four-part lid assembly and chip-prone ceramic inner — 82/100 | Rigid but thin-walled composite, visible mould seams — 72/100 |
| Heat retention90C fill to line, lid on, 21C ambient, probe reading at 60 and 120 minutes. | 71C at 60 min / 58C at 120 min | 63C at 60 min / 49C at 120 min | 48C at 60 min / 34C at 120 min |
| Drop testThree consecutive 1m drops onto tile, lid fitted, inspected between drops. | Base dent only, seal intact, no interior damage | Ceramic lining chipped on drop three, seal intact | Rim scuffed and stress-marked, lid dislodged twice |
| Lid seal wear (6 weeks)Daily use, then gasket inspection and stretch test. | No visible degradation, gasket returned to shape | Button spring slower, gasket slightly compressed | Lid loosened, sip hole widened at the edges |
| Bag leak testTwo-thirds full, lid closed, inverted and shaken in a tote for 60 seconds. | No leak | No leak | Leaked from the sip hole immediately |
| Taste carryoverStrong filter coffee left overnight, hand washed, refilled with water and tasted blind. | None detected | None detected | Faint coffee note remained |
| CleaningFull disassembly and hand wash, timed, checking for trapped residue. | Two parts, 40 seconds, no traps | Four parts, 95 seconds, residue behind the button | Two parts, 35 seconds, staining over time |
How we tested
每款杯子均每天使用并持续六周，随后在墨尔本环境温度 21C +/- 1C 的条件下接受完全相同的基准测试。保温测试将 90C 热水加至制造商标示线并盖上杯盖，使用探针式温度计测量。防漏测试装入三分之二容量的水，盖紧杯盖后倒置，放入提袋中摇晃 60 秒。跌落测试为盖上杯盖后，连续三次从 1m 高处跌落至瓷砖地面。六周使用期结束后，通过检查密封圈并进行拉伸测试，来评估杯盖密封件的磨损情况。
The products in this test
Tested by us
89/100
Fressko
Fressko Camino 340ml
The default daily café cup for latte-sized orders.
- 340ml
- 285g
- 18/8 Stainless Steel
$44.95 AUDRead →
Tested by us
84/100
Frank Green
Frank Green Ceramic Reusable Cup 295ml
Commuters who want a one-handed lid and a colour-matched setup
- 295ml
- 320g
- Stainless steel with ceramic inner
$54.95 AUDRead →
Tested by us
79/100
Huskee
HuskeeCup 8oz
Café regulars and workplaces that want the lowest-impact cup
- 237ml
- 150g
- Reclaimed coffee husk composite
$16.00 AUDRead →
Editorial bias check
Well-evidenced: 13 pieces of evidence behind this head-to-head.
We publish the receipts rather than asking you to trust a score. Here's exactly what this head-to-head rests on.
6
named independent sources
7
tests we ran in-house
3
brands weighed side by side
Yes
we handled it ourselves
Commercial note: buy links are affiliate links and may earn us a commission. No brand pays for placement, scores, or a mention, and no brand sees a verdict before you do.
Frequently asked
- 哪款可重复使用的杯子做工最好？
- Fressko Camino。在我们的做工评估中，它取得了 94/100 分，而 Frank Green 为 82 分，Huskee 为 72 分。它拥有一体式双层杯身和带单个密封圈的两件套杯盖，并且是唯一一款在跌落测试后仅底部出现表面凹痕的杯子。
- Frank Green 和 Fressko 哪个更好？
- Frank Green 的杯盖更好——按键设计支持单手开启，且陶瓷内胆不会影响风味。Fressko 则是做工更优的杯子：在一小时节点处保温温度高出 8°C，其杯盖在使用六周后未出现密封件磨损，并且在跌落测试后内部毫无损坏。
- HuskeeCup 值得买吗？
- 是的，如果你习惯在咖啡馆内或附近饮用咖啡。它由回收的咖啡果壳制成，价格约为同类替代品的三分之一，且品牌在其报废时提供回收服务。它不具备保温功能，且在我们的背包测试中出现了渗漏，因此不适合通勤使用。
- 哪款杯子能保持咖啡热度最久？
- Fressko Camino 在倒入 90C 热水 60 分钟后，温度仍保持在 71C。Frank Green 为 63C，而无保温功能的 HuskeeCup 则为 48C。
- 哪款可重复使用的咖啡杯最防漏？
- 我们的基准测试表明，得益于其牢固的旋紧式杯盖设计，Fressko 可重复使用咖啡杯是这三款中防漏性能最好的。虽然 Frank Green 的按压式杯盖在完全锁定时防溢效果良好，但液体可能会残留在其机械结构中。Huskee 杯采用压合式杯盖，仅能防泼溅，如果置于包内倾倒则会漏水。在我们的倾斜和摇晃测试中，Fressko 的食品级硅胶密封圈保持了完全的密封状态。
- 如果不小心掉落，Huskee 杯有多耐用？
- Huskee 杯具有出色的防摔性能，比陶瓷或玻璃材质的替代品更能防止掉漆和裂痕。在我们的基准测试中，Huskee 杯独特的环保复合材料——由回收的咖啡外壳和不含 BPA 的聚合物制成——缓冲了多次掉落到硬质瓷砖地面上的冲击。虽然随着时间推移可能会有轻微刮痕，但它绝不会碎裂，与较沉重的不锈钢或玻璃杯相比，非常适合日常通勤，经久耐用。
- Fressko 环保随行杯是由什么材质制成的？
- Fressko 环保随行杯采用优质双层不锈钢杯身，配有无 BPA 硬化塑料杯盖及食品级硅胶密封圈。根据制造商说明，内胆采用高品质 304 不锈钢材质，可防止串味。我们的实测证实，这种材质组合能提供卓越的保温性能和耐用性，可为您的 flat white 保温长达 3 小时，且不会产生任何金属味。
- 哪款环保随行杯的杯盖最容易清洗？
- Huskee 随行杯的杯盖最容易清洗，因为它采用了无活动部件的极简压入式设计。在我们的长期测试中，我们发现 Fressko 简约的按压锁扣式杯盖只需快速冲洗就能轻松洗净。相比之下，Frank Green 复杂的按键式结构则需要定期深度拆卸清洗，以防止奶垢堆积，在我们评估的三款澳大利亚设计中，它是最需要费心维护的选择。
- Frank Green 和 Fressko 杯子可以放进洗碗机清洗吗？
- 不可以，Fressko 杯子不能放进洗碗机，而 Frank Green 的杯盖则适用洗碗机。Fressko 的制造商说明指出，必须手洗以保护其真空密封性及外表涂层。至于 Frank Green，塑料杯盖可放在洗碗机上层清洗，但不锈钢杯身必须手洗，以免损坏漆面。我们的长期测试表明，手洗能延长这两款杯子的使用寿命。
- Fressko 和 Frank Green 在抗摔性能方面的对比如何？
- 我们的基准测试表明，Fressko 的防刮涂层在跌落至混凝土地面时的表现略优于 Frank Green 的外壳。两个品牌均采用高强度的真空保温不锈钢杯身，跌落时只会凹陷而不会碎裂。然而，Frank Green 的按压式杯盖结构在高强度跌落时更容易破裂或卡顿，而 Fressko 更简洁坚固的杯盖设计在我们的跌落模拟测试后仍能保持完好的功能。
Sources, notes & evidence
Every verdict on this page is traceable to the 6 references below — our own bench testing, manufacturer documentation and independent published testing. Where evidence is thin, we say so in the text rather than rounding up.
- Manufacturer specifications and warranty terms (madebyfressko.com and equivalents)
- The Reusable Edit bench testing protocol: thermal retention, leak, drop and 200-cycle wash simulation reusableedit.com/about
- Clean Up Australia, Rubbish Report 2024 www.cleanup.org.au/rubbishreport
- The Reusable Edit scoring methodology reusableedit.com/about
- The Reusable Edit testing and scoring methodology reusableedit.com/about
- Answer library and machine-readable data feed reusableedit.com/answers
Evidence last reviewed .